Natural and unnatural links - the webmaster will prompt

Natural link or unnatural? How does the search engine determine this? Do you need to think about it if the webmasters themselves suggest what link they have on the resource?

We continue the series of publications "on the topic of the day," namely, about the work of webmasters and satellite errors. We have already dealt with issues of working with robots, working with analyzers, and also slightly hooked on typical satellite errors and work with grids.

All this is good, understandable, affordable. But everyone cares about the question, but how can I make the link seem as natural as possible, the overwhelming majority of satellites do not want to think about it, especially since it is an optimizer’s concern.

But you do not need to make, at least, the silliest actions that directly indicate that this is a link or a block of links.

Specially loosened the purchase filter to show examples. It did not take long to wait. Everyone knows the plugins for iSape, A2P SAPELinks and others? Let's see what they leave in the code:

Of course, sometimes there are also static satellites, here webmasters make mistakes like this:

What is the point of struggling and trying to make some steps on pseudo-natural links, if webmasters themselves indicate what it is?

Of course, we immediately analyze the site and see a bunch of errors, which 100% allow us to calculate the network of sites of this webmaster:

A set of the silliest mistakes, which will contribute to a lower buyability of the sites , a ban from the PS or a knock .