Family destruction

How does the "cell of society." And more and more what that defective cells. Distorted, incomplete. Unstable.
Instability is the key concept here. There is no solid building made of fragile bricks. There is no stable system of unstable subsystems.
When people suffered, gnawed each other, hated and sometimes even killed because of the impossibility of a divorce - this, of course, was bad. Changed, feuded, but were forced by law and moral to observe the false appearance of the family hearth.
Alas, we live in a world that is not ideal by definition.
So - freedom. The rights of the individual. Law and morality - modern, enlightened, humane and democratic.
Live as you want. Married and out of wedlock, before marriage and instead of marriage. No one dares to prevent and condemn. Your right.
Bach beat with sticks and impose an additional tax? We, fortunately, are not savages Spartans.
To stigmatize poor mother alone? We are not beasts, not hypocrites, not stupid puritans.
On the contrary: we support those who find it harder to live. Mother alone we will hire more than a family mother. And we will give her a different allowance for raising a child.
Oh pa! - as soon as the single mother marries, she will lose the preferential right to the desired job. And all benefits to single mothers, too, will lose.
It is economically more profitable today in a civilized state to live and raise children, cohabiting with a partner (a lover is an outdated concept stylistically compromised) outside of marriage. To this encourages the state.
Here are those on.
And there are fewer mutual obligations, there are fewer economic traps during a divorce, and the man feels freer. Love is a child of freedom. Long live Carmen. Gypsy love.
Free cohabitation. Anarchy is the mother of order. Greetings from the Utopian Communists.
Marriage and divorce have ceased to be the slightest problem. At least ten times. Take the example of "high society" - Hollywood in the scandalous chronicles.
And without children it is easier to get married again. And without children, you solve a number of problems with alimony. And for the soul and getting rid of loneliness, one is enough, in general.
And a single mother with four children is no longer a breadwinner. On the benefits received, she lives and still drinks. And if they grow up on the street by gangsters - this is their problem. These damned capitalists oppress poor people. True, this is only for the lower classes - nat racial, mostly. Native sotsialytsiki.
The whole centuries-old period of development of our civilization, with the numerous costs of monogamy, however, most families were normal - they got along, swore, grew together, overcame together and experienced joy. In recent decades, there is a “normal” minority of families: today's students have both parents in their home, yes in their first marriage, and no other children outside of this family — yes, this is almost rare, less than half such cases.