Dysfunctional families

It is a pity that eroticism in the human consciousness, as well as in its practical application, has lost its healthy nature and ability for internal contact. Still, overt sexual need is a requirement of nature, reinforcing the quality of individual and collective growth.
In a sexual event, both marriage and extra-marital, everyone contacts with himself, giving the partner a sign allowing him to touch him. But because of their immaturity, people most often control only such signs, without partaking of the sacrament of pleasure provided by nature to increase the mind of the strong. If two In-se not come in contact with each other, then they do not open and, therefore, do not realize themselves in ecstasy, in no way justifying the expectations of nature and man.
The focus on pleasure determines responsibility for the action. The root of pleasure is always the fruit of open, creative action. In order to become active participants in society, children especially need the presence of adults who have realized themselves in enjoyment. On the contrary, the observed stereotype of sacrificial behavior often generates a desire for revenge and vendetta, or disrespect for life.
The inner unconscious (and sometimes openly manifested) dissatisfaction of the parent predetermines the child's mental and affective programming, which, moving subsequently from a closed (intra-family) context to an open (social) context, retains the desire to restore balance through violence.
A pulsation of such a need can unite and unify certain mental and biological processes. Analysis of cases of pronounced criminal tendencies, teenage dreams, disagreements that appear between father and son, and parity relationships between the unconscious structure of the parent (or the one who performs his role) and the actual response to her growing offspring convincingly demonstrate that a dysfunctional family is a kind "Nursery" of abnormal and asocial programming.
In order to prevent this, intervention of cultural and political psychotherapy is necessary in two directions:

1) To analyze more thoroughly and more deeply the unconscious sphere of the individual and his family, using, in particular, the ontopsychological method. After all, it is useless to treat in prison the external manifestations of the phenomenon, leaving intact the hidden causes that give rise to it.
2) To promote consistent egocentrism of action, the norm of which is the greatest possible pleasure, teaching that any pedocentrism2 should always be relative. Children must be derived from an existential act performed by a creative person, for whom children or the family are a significant event, but not a goal.
It is then that the children will be needed by themselves and will be aimed at egocentric and social projection. If, however, insist on family duty and put devotion and self-denial on the pedestal for the sake of children, then the final projection, the person, is disorganized, and social deviation is intensified. Nature gives us a good example: the tree always takes care of itself, giving fruits and seeds during this process; the animal takes care of the continuation of the race as a means of its own enjoyment. Everything makes you think that the well-being of the family and children directly depends on the degree of rational and organized expansion of personal egocentrism, which preserves the child’s absolute uniqueness and the harmonious fullness of his personality.