Land price

The Earth for humanity is not a private property (an object of RIGHT), but the only available habitat is quite obvious. And relations between people and nature are built with this reality in mind, i.e. Earth, water, air and the Sun above a head are given to a person at his complete disposal, but only for the time of his mortal existence.

Given by the fact of birth. And if a person was born on our Planet, then the whole, the whole World and the whole Universe "belong" to him, though together with his brothers in life and kind, at least as long as he is alive: after that, the order of things changes and man already belongs to the Earth. Since the system is closed and limited, it is quite obvious that if there are too many people, then naturally, the earth, air, water and other vital renewable resources per person become smaller and vice versa, if there are few people on the planet, then more.

We are not talking about non-renewable resources here - this is the tragedy of the whole of humanity as a phenomenon. A well-known fact reflecting these assumptions is that in all its foreseeable history, mankind has developed (found) practically only one type of currency, which allowed to regulate real vital things - this is the population (blood), the technology of “presentation” of which is realized mainly by wars In the coordinate system, “buying and selling” is the life of the born or unborn representatives of the people whose land they “bought” or, as it is sometimes said, “acquired”. In any case, there is the exclusion of the people who previously lived in the given territory (land). It turned out that: The earth is irrigated with sweat, but it is acquired with blood. A striking example of this thesis is the current state of the former united states of the USSR, Yugoslavia. The land was always ultimately acquired by war, and it is possible that this will continue.

By the way, economics ignores all of the above. Various attempts to hand over fake (money) instead of real currency, eventually with rare exceptions, failed, and everything eventually fell into place, which is also confirmed by recent history. True, in some cases, the land was taken by one, and others paid the price for it, which is already the subject of the art of politics, but doesn’t change the essence (the people always thought "For what ..., for what values ​​..., for whom ... does he shed blood?"). It should also be noted here that in the history of mankind, war for the Territory over many generations (centenary wars) is a completely natural thing. No matter how slowly the territories were acquired, they do not see anything terrible in this - everything will pay off in the distant future with interest. Another truth is that people are inventing more and more new means of waging war and reducing the population of the "enemy", both military and "technological", for example: economic, political, organizational.