Chapter 3. Language as an Object of Modern Philology. 3.1. Why Is Natural Language an Object of Modern Philology?

Lecture



…in the world there is only one miracle — language.

G. Genette

Natural human language has always been at the center of philology's attention. In the 20th century it is recognized as an object of philology.

Characteristic is the position of F. de Saussure (1857—1913) — one

of the greatest linguists of the 20th century, who articulated the significance of language for philology in its traditional understanding. Considering the relations between philology and linguistics,

the scholar states that philology differs sharply from linguistics: «Language is not the sole object of philology:

above all, it sets itself the task of establishing, interpreting, and

commenting on texts. This basic task also leads it

to engage with the history of literature, of everyday life, of social institutions,

and so on ...its interests lie almost exclusively in the field of Greek and Roman antiquities». Language is called upon by philology

in order «to compare texts of different eras, to determine the

language peculiar to a given author, to decipher and explain inscriptions in archaic or poorly known languages».

In linguistics, on the other hand, «language constitutes a whole

in itself...»1

.

Saussure links the recognition of language as an object of philology (more precisely, as one of its

objects) to the tasks that face philology as a science of antiquities, that is, philology

in the traditional sense.

Let us turn to contemporary philology. At the present stage of philology's development, the task of studying ancient

68 69

texts is retained — in classical and national philology (in the latter — in the study of the language and literature of ancient periods),

and in work with newly discovered texts. Thus, in the 20th century in Egypt

many ancient Greek documents written

on papyrus were found. These documents had already been lost in antiquity. Papyrology arose (Ancient Greek papyros — probably

a Hellenized form of an ancient Egyptian word for «royal») —

an auxiliary historical-philological discipline, closely related to paleography.

In the 20th century, one more reason for language's relevance to

philology persists: within the sphere of philology lies the study of

the language of imaginative literature and the language of oral folk-poetic creativity. Language is the foundation («primary element») of literature. The languages of imaginative literature and of oral folk-poetic creativity have their own specificity

compared with the national language as a whole: the language of imaginative literature is based on the national language in its literary form; while the basis of the language of folklore is dialect. But

despite these differences, the language of imaginative literature and

the language of folklore are both l a n g u a g e: «...poetry is written not with ideas, but with

words» (Mallarmé).

Let us give an example. In the «Dictionary of M. Gorky's Dramaturgy»

(Saratov, 1994. Issue 2), a usage of the word

«thought» is recorded in a meaning absent from the explanatory dictionary

reflecting the state of the lexicon in the first half of the 20th century (Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language / ed. D.N. Ushakov. Moscow, 1938.

Vol. II): «thought <...> — g r e a t t h o u g h t s (periphrasis). Political ideas connected with the social order of society.

Kalmykova [to Shura]. And I am asking: are you capable of taking seriously a great and dangerous cause, great thoughts, everything

that is opening up before you? This you must decide once and for

all. Decisive days are approaching».

This and similar facts demonstrate the writer's ability to create contextual meaning for a word, to add to its

meaning, to combine meanings within a word, and so on. Such linguistic phenomena

fall within the field of interest of both linguistics and literary studies.

In the 20th century, especially in its second half, the specialization of language in various fields of activity is markedly developing

— journalism, advertising, politics, and others. Thus, alongside the language of imaginative literature and the language

of folklore, other varieties of language arise or develop — the languages of journalism, advertising, politics, law, and so on.

For example, at the turn of the 1980s—1990s, parliamentary speech began to be studied in Russia. Already at that time

genres of parliamentary speech had taken shape, such as the official deputy inquiry, the retort, the question, the informational statement, the discussion

speech, and others. Traditional genres, for example the report,

undergo certain changes. Thus, in the reports of Russia's first President, B.N. Yeltsin, his own personal attitude toward the problems under discussion is emphasized: «Until now

privatization has proceeded slowly and clumsily»; «We need

millions of owners, not a hundred millionaires»; «However difficult it may

be, the national wealth of Russia is sacred and indivisible!». «Generic diversity is connected not so much with linguistic canons as with the specifics of political life

in its multifaceted «human dimension»», it is emphasized in the collective work «The Culture of Parliamentary Speech»

(Moscow, 1994. P. 34).

Accordingly, new scholarly

disciplines take shape within philology: political linguistics, legal linguistics, advertising studies, and others.

Moreover, philology at the present stage of its development retains responsibility for solving the problem of understanding — the chief problem of human existence.

Understanding in our time is complicated by many factors

connected with language. Let us note two of them.

The first factor: since the end of the 20th — the beginning of the 21st century, unprecedentedly active processes of interaction between languages have been under way, their freer

«movement» in space. It is no accident that since the mid-1980s, discussions have been under way in our country about the role of

the influence of English on the Russian language. In the course of these discussions,

among ordinary speakers, often politically motivated,

70 71

the following thesis is put forward: is the Russian language, as an embodiment

of the spirit of the Russian

people, not being destroyed by this influence?

This «complicating» factor requires broader study than purely linguistic study. It requires

an appeal to the broad context of the existence and development of

the language: it is important to understand both the specific nature of a people's culture and the significance of imaginative literature within that culture. Anglicisms

enter predominantly into those spheres of contemporary Russian

speech in which the corresponding Russian designations

are absent or are international. This has always been so,

for example during the period of struggle against foreign borrowings at the turn of the 18th–19th centuries. The well-known statesman of that time, Admiral A.S. Shishkov, believed that

borrowings only harmed the Russian language. From his opponents he received a parody of the word-usage devices he propagated: instead of the phrase with a number of foreign

words — A dandy goes from the circus to the theater along the boulevard in galoshes —

its translation in Shishkov's style was cited: A finery-lover proceeds

along the promenade from the arena to the spectacle in wet-treaders.

Much time has passed since then. The Russian language has undergone

more than one foreign-language influence; but it has not only survived as Russian, but has also been enriched through the resources of other languages. So it is now. Let us give two texts. Their comparison will demonstrate

the fact that foreign words are used out of necessity (the reader

will be able to carry out the analysis independently):

1) When installing the Mail Reader program, we connected the additional library module of the Word editor, and now you

can recode mail messages directly in

Word.

Before launching the editor, once again copy from the

mail program to the clipboard the message you received from the mail robot in the encoding that your mail program does not read. This time we will recode it in the Word editor (A Modern Self-Study Guide to Working on the

Internet. The Most Popular Programs. Moscow, 2002. P. 195);

2) Sasha, a young man of about twenty-five, thin, awkward, sits on

the open gallery of the second floor and listens to birdsong.

Astrakhan, springtime. The gallery is old, running around the courtyard of an old house. Part of it was once glazed, the peeling frames are

still in place, but the small squares of glass have survived in only two or three

fragments of the pattern. Red mangy roofs, a courtyard trodden every which way and hung with laundry, an acacia tree. There,

within the foliage — two turtledoves — vyurr! vyurr! (V. Golovanov.

The Secret Language of Birds // Novy Mir. 2009. No. 1. P. 7).

At the same time, Russian texts are being actively translated into

English. It is interesting that in these translations, from the point of view of

a native speaker of Russian, inaccuracies sometimes occur, leading to an «adaptation» of Russian realia to the realia

of the country receiving the translated text. This hinders the English-speaking reader's grasp of the text's meaning.

Let us give an example. In translating the sentence «Vanka wasn't quite happy about something in the town hospital...» (V. Shukshin. Vanka

Teplyashin) into British English and into American English, the following situation is found: the Russian gorbol'nitsa is in both cases rendered by the English city. See:

Somehow Vanka didn’t like being in the city hospital (American

version); For some reason, Vanka didn’t like the city hospital very

much (British version). However, the meaning of the English city in these

national variants of English differs. In American culture, city is used to denote a small town; in British culture, City refers to a large industrial city (a metropolis).

The second factor: in the processes of speech communication, the role of intermediaries is increasing. Of these

intermediaries, the most conspicuous today is the Internet. In solving the problem of understanding, this intermediary demands a fresh turn to philology: the language of the Internet is one more language, added to

the language of imaginative literature, political language, business language,

and others. In this language, understanding acquires its own difficulties.

One reason for these difficulties lies in the fact that Internet-communication processes are affected by norms adopted in

72 73

direct (oral) and mediated (written)

communication.

See a fragment of a conversation on «Skype» (A. and B. are talking)

A. Today is some kind of day of collisions: an acquaintance of mine

was hit by a car at an intersection! Fortunately, thank God, everything turned out fine, she's alive, her arms and legs are intact, she's coming to!

B. And they've announced at our place that spring has come and all the heating plants are switching to the spring regime (the fact that it's –28 at night doesn't count)

A. Well, I never!!

What a thing to do!

B. In the apartment it's fine anyway (+18–20).

A. There's one very nasty intersection in our city — that's exactly where she got hit, and she was crossing on the green light, I myself when I cross there — I don't watch the

traffic light, I watch for cars! And the car fled

the scene!

B. Take care...

Still, we'll get through it: the Sun is with us!

A.:) that's for sure!

As in the case of direct communication, several topics are discussed in the conversation (each topic is marked by its own typeface). However, the parallel discussion of several topics does not hinder understanding, if the discussion is conducted in writing (the text

must be before one's eyes) or if the «intrusion» of one topic

into another is not as deep as in the material cited. Finally, the piecemeal delivery of information, the «smiley» — these are possibilities afforded by the Internet.

But the matter does not end there. Works of imaginative literature published on the Web can differ considerably from

their «paper» counterparts. Thus, the authors of works published on the site proza.ru under the heading «miniature» classify as

miniatures texts ranging from 5—10 characters to 10 thousand

characters, texts that are monological, dialogical, prose, and

verse. Let us give a few examples.

l A brief miniature:

Don't sweet-talk my golden teeth (Pavel In. Luxurious

Lies).

l In the form of a dialogue:

— Oh-h...

— May I help you?

— If you could help me do something real,

with your own hands.

— That is precisely what does it from the outset — God.

— Rea-lly? (Sergei Odiniz. Dialogues).

l in verse form:

The last shot of sorrowful eyes —

— A double shot across the left shoulder.

And pain like a shadow. From words of farewell

The mind is molten.

Ho

t

! (Dymok. Hot).

The belonging of the cited texts to the genre of the miniature

in the traditional content of that concept is not beyond dispute.

It is no accident that literature published on the Web is called

Web-literature. «WEB-LITERATURE» — a form of creative activity based on the use of

writing, the final product of which (the work) can be placed on

nodes of a computer network dispersed in space, can be modified (edited)

over time, and be accessible to many consumers from different

places simultaneously» ([Electronic resource]. Access mode:

http: / / slovar.lib.ru / dictionary / seteratura.htm).

So then, the question posed in the title of this section — why

is language an object of contemporary philology? — has several answers: such is tradition; all the sciences that make up contemporary philology deal with language (this was said for the first time in Chapter 1); in contemporary philology as a whole there

exist key problems connected with language that can be solved only through the combined effort of the philological sciences.

Comments

To leave a comment

If you have any suggestion, idea, thanks or comment, feel free to write. We really value feedback and are glad to hear your opinion.
To reply

Lectures and tutorial on "Lectures in Philology"

Terms: Lectures in Philology