You get a bonus - 1 coin for daily activity. Now you have 1 coin

24. Systematic confoundings as threats to internal validity

Lecture



Singling out any independent variable does not rule out the possibility that the basic process is affected by both random and non-randomly accompanying changes in other variables that are not part of the hypothesized relationship between the independent and dependent variables. These are confounding (extraneous) variables.

An extraneous variable is a variable that is not part of the experimental hypothesis but that, under experimental conditions, may either affect the basic process under study or become confounded with the independent or dependent variable, thereby distorting the form of the dependence being investigated.

The greatest threats to internal validity come from systematic and non-systematic confoundings with extraneous variables.

Internal validity is a criterion for evaluating the planning and conduct of a study that allows conclusions to be regarded as reliable specifically about the particular dependence (and not another) that is formulated in the experimental hypothesis.

Systematic confounding is a non-random confounding of the levels of the independent variable and the extraneous variable, in which a particular level of the independent variable is regularly combined with an active or inactive level of the extraneous variable, as a result of which one cannot conclude that the established experimental effect is due to the action of the independent variable rather than the extraneous variable.

Experimental control should include stabilizing other confounding variables or randomly varying them across levels in order to rule out a correlation between the independent variable and the extraneous variable.

Controlling confoundings of the independent variable with the extraneous variable is the main task of planning when developing experimental schemes.

Extraneous variables are usually controlled by stabilizing them, or by averaging out the influences they exert, or by other means that are typically dictated by the chosen experimental scheme (for example, this may be presenting the extraneous variable at all levels of the independent variable, as in the experiment with the monkeys).

Thus, the confounding (extraneous) variables – changes in variables not included in the hypothesized relationship between X and Y – must be controlled.

Bredenkamp's scheme:

  1. artifactual conclusion: X→ confounding variable →Y

  2. reliable conclusion (provided the third variable is controlled):

X →

X × confounding variable → Y

confounding variable →

Comments

To leave a comment

If you have any suggestion, idea, thanks or comment, feel free to write. We really value feedback and are glad to hear your opinion.
To reply

Lectures and tutorial on "Experimental psychology"

Terms: Experimental psychology